Opinion
No. SC16–118
03-09-2017
Joyce C. SHAW, et al., Petitioner, v. Mark A. HUNTER, Sheriff, etc., et al., Respondent.
George T. Reeves of Davis, Schnitker, Reeves & Browning, P.A., Madison, Florida, for Petitioners Jason Vail of Jolly, Peterson & Truckenbrod, P.A., Tallahassee, Florida, for Respondent Mark A. Hunter, Sheriff Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Rachel Erin Nordby, Deputy Solicitor General, Tallahassee, Florida, for Amicus Curiae the State of Florida Robert Wayne Evans and Matthew D. Stefany of Allen, Norton & Blue, P.A., Tallahassee, Florida, for Amicus Curiae Florida Sheriffs Association
George T. Reeves of Davis, Schnitker, Reeves & Browning, P.A., Madison, Florida, for Petitioners
Jason Vail of Jolly, Peterson & Truckenbrod, P.A., Tallahassee, Florida, for Respondent Mark A. Hunter, Sheriff
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Rachel Erin Nordby, Deputy Solicitor General, Tallahassee, Florida, for Amicus Curiae the State of Florida
Robert Wayne Evans and Matthew D. Stefany of Allen, Norton & Blue, P.A., Tallahassee, Florida, for Amicus Curiae Florida Sheriffs Association
QUINCE, J.
We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in Hunter v. Shaw , 182 So.3d 784 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. After further consideration, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss this review proceeding.
It is so ordered.
NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.
LABARGA, C.J., and CANADY, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.
PARIENTE and LEWIS, JJ., dissent.