From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shaw v. Hood

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA WESTERN DIVISION
Jan 23, 2017
Case No.: 7:14-cv-389-RDP-JEO (N.D. Ala. Jan. 23, 2017)

Opinion

Case No.: 7:14-cv-389-RDP-JEO

01-23-2017

NATHANIEL SHAW, Plaintiff, v. HUGH M. HOOD, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

On January 4, 2017, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation was entered and the parties were allowed therein fourteen (14) days in which to file objections to the recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. On January 20, 2017, Petitioner filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 61).

After careful consideration of the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and Petitioner's objections thereto, the court hereby ADOPTS the Report of the Magistrate Judge. The court further ACCEPTS the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge that the motions for summary judgment be granted and this action be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

A separate order in accordance with the Memorandum Opinion will be entered.

DONE and ORDERED this January 23, 2017.

/s/_________

R. DAVID PROCTOR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Shaw v. Hood

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA WESTERN DIVISION
Jan 23, 2017
Case No.: 7:14-cv-389-RDP-JEO (N.D. Ala. Jan. 23, 2017)
Case details for

Shaw v. Hood

Case Details

Full title:NATHANIEL SHAW, Plaintiff, v. HUGH M. HOOD, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 23, 2017

Citations

Case No.: 7:14-cv-389-RDP-JEO (N.D. Ala. Jan. 23, 2017)