From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shaw v. Garrett

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 2, 2023
3:23-cv-00063-MMD-CSD (D. Nev. Aug. 2, 2023)

Opinion

3:23-cv-00063-MMD-CSD

08-02-2023

WILLIAM SHAW, Petitioner, v. TIM GARRETT, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

MIRANDA M. DU, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On February 14, 2023, this Court issued an order instructing pro se Petitioner William Shaw to show cause why this action should not be dismissed as untimely, unexhausted and/or moot. (ECF No. 4.) Shaw responded and moved for a stay. (ECF Nos. 9, 10.) Given Shaw's responses to the Court's order to show cause, including especially Shaw's allegations regarding mootness which the Court is unable to verify on the current record, the Court ordered Respondents to respond to Shaw's response to the order to show cause. (ECF No. 11.) Respondents now move for a 30-day extension to file their response, explaining that they have not yet obtained the requisite documents from the NDOC for their response. (ECF No. 13.) The Court finds good cause to grant the extension motion.

It is therefore ordered that Respondents' motion for extension of time (ECF No. 13) is granted. Respondents have up to and including August 30, 2023 to file their response.


Summaries of

Shaw v. Garrett

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 2, 2023
3:23-cv-00063-MMD-CSD (D. Nev. Aug. 2, 2023)
Case details for

Shaw v. Garrett

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM SHAW, Petitioner, v. TIM GARRETT, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Aug 2, 2023

Citations

3:23-cv-00063-MMD-CSD (D. Nev. Aug. 2, 2023)