From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

SHAW, LICITRA, EISENBERG, ESERNIO v. GELB

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 6, 1995
221 A.D.2d 331 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

November 6, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O'Brien, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff agreed to represent the defendant in a criminal matter and in a related civil case in Federal court. According to the plaintiff, the parties agreed that the plaintiff would be paid on an hourly basis at the reduced rate of $150 per hour. Crediting the testimony of the plaintiff's witness and its documentary evidence, including time records indicating the services performed by various attorneys, the court awarded judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the evidence submitted was sufficient to support the judgment. The time records were properly admitted into evidence pursuant to the business records exception to the hearsay rule (see, CPLR 4518 [a]; People v Kennedy, 68 N.Y.2d 569). The records indicated which attorney worked on the defendant's cases, the tasks performed, and the time spent on each task, on a daily basis.

In addition, the defendant's expressions of satisfaction with the plaintiff's efforts on his behalf, as contained in the documentary evidence, belie the defendant's assertions at trial and on appeal that the plaintiff's work was wastefull or unnecessary.

Accordingly, judgment was properly granted in favor of the plaintiff. Mangano, P.J., Bracken, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

SHAW, LICITRA, EISENBERG, ESERNIO v. GELB

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 6, 1995
221 A.D.2d 331 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

SHAW, LICITRA, EISENBERG, ESERNIO v. GELB

Case Details

Full title:SHAW, LICITRA, EISENBERG, ESERNIO AND SCHWARTZ, P.C., Respondent, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 6, 1995

Citations

221 A.D.2d 331 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
633 N.Y.S.2d 212

Citing Cases

Xanboo v. Michael Ring

The records, which identified the attorneys who worked on the case, the tasks that they performed, and the…

SHAW, LICITRA, EISENBERG, ESERNIO SCHWARTZ v. GELB

Decided March 21, 1996 Appeal from (2d Dept: 221 A.D.2d 331) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL GRANTED OR…