From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shatek v. George A. Hormel Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota
May 5, 1989
438 N.W.2d 924 (Minn. 1989)

Opinion

No. C1-88-1823.

May 5, 1989.

Certiorari to Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals Court.

Gilmore, de Lambert, Aafedt and Forde, P.A., E. Michael Forde, Minneapolis, for relator.

Sieben, Grose, Von Holtum, and McCoy, Ltd., David Stofferahn, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.


ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

WHEREAS the self-insured employer/relator sought certiorari for review of the issue as to whether the general recall letter sent by the self-insured employer/relator to all striking employees extended a genuine and unequivocal offer of suitable employment to a disabled employee which was refused upon the employee's failure to respond to the letter; and

WHEREAS the court being evenly divided as to the issue presented on appeal;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals, filed July 28, 1988, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Anchor Cas. Co. v. Miller, 258 Minn. 585, 105 N.W.2d 689 (1960).

KELLEY, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


Summaries of

Shatek v. George A. Hormel Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota
May 5, 1989
438 N.W.2d 924 (Minn. 1989)
Case details for

Shatek v. George A. Hormel Co.

Case Details

Full title:Richard G. SHATEK, Respondent, v. GEORGE A. HORMEL COMPANY, Self-Insured…

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: May 5, 1989

Citations

438 N.W.2d 924 (Minn. 1989)