From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sharum v. Lasley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
May 29, 1923
215 P. 757 (Okla. 1923)

Opinion

No. 11205

Opinion Filed May 29, 1923.

(Syllabus.)

Appeal and Error — Case-Made — Extension of Time — Authority of Special Judge.

After a special judge has ceased to sit as a court, he has no power to extend the time for making and serving a case-made in any action tried before him, and when he attempts to do so his act is a nullity.

Error from District Court, Cherokee County; A.C. Brewster, Judge.

Action between A.H. Sharum and Ora Lasley, nee Dennis, nee Hicks. From the judgment, the former brings error. Dismissed.

W.F. Rampendahl and Bonds Brown, for plaintiff in error.

W.H. Kisner and Rainey Flynn, for defendant in error.


This cause was tried before a special judge, who upon overruling the motion for a new trial granted additional time in which to prepare and serve a case-made. The case-made was not served in the time allowed, but before the expiration thereof, by order of the special judge, made after the expiration of the time that he was assigned to hold court in that district and after he had ceased to sit as a court therein, an additional extension was granted, and thereafter other orders were entered by him granting additional extensions.

It is settled that a special judge has no power, after he ceases to sit as a court, to extend the time for making and serving a case-made, and where he attempts to do so, his act is a nullity; therefore, the motion to dismiss must be sustained. McGuire v. McGuire, 78 Okla. 164, 189 P. 193; First State Bank v. School District, 63 Okla. 233, 164 P. 102; Bradley v. Farmers State Bank, 45 Okla. 763, 147 P. 302.

The appeal is dismissed.


Summaries of

Sharum v. Lasley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
May 29, 1923
215 P. 757 (Okla. 1923)
Case details for

Sharum v. Lasley

Case Details

Full title:SHARUM v. LASLEY

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: May 29, 1923

Citations

215 P. 757 (Okla. 1923)
90 Okla. 34