From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sharrette v. Credit Suisse International

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, Oakland Division
Jun 25, 2014
4:13-cv-02783-SBA (N.D. Cal. Jun. 25, 2014)

Opinion

          Thomas L. Laughlin IV, Deborah Clark-Weintraub, SCOTT+SCOTT, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP, New York, NY, Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs.


          STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO FILE NUNC PRO TUNC AN OVERSIZED BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS THE CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT

          SAUNDRA BROWN ARMOSTRONG, District Judge.

         Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 7-12, Plaintiffs hereby submit this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Their Motion for Administrative Relief to File Nunc Pro Tunc an Oversized Brief in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint.

         WHEREAS, on April 4, 2014, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint (ECF No. 53);

         WHEREAS, on June 10, 2014, Plaintiffs filed an Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint (ECF No. 58), which Opposition is four pages in excess of the page limit specified by this Court's Standing Orders;

         WHEREAS, Plaintiffs notified Defendants of their intent to file a Motion for Administrative Relief to File Nunc Pro Tunc an Oversized Brief in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint; and

         WHEREAS, Defendants do not oppose Plaintiffs' Motion for Administrative Relief to File Nunc Pro Tunc an Oversized Brief in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint, as long as Defendants also receive an additional four pages for their reply brief;

         THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by all parties through their respective counsel of record, that:

         1. Plaintiffs shall be granted the right to file nunc pro tunc an oversized brief in opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint, which brief will be nineteen (19) pages in length; and

         2. Defendants shall be granted the right to file a reply brief that shall not exceed fourteen (14) pages in length, a four-page increase commensurate with the additional pages granted to Plaintiffs.

         PURSUANT TO THIS STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Sharrette v. Credit Suisse International

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, Oakland Division
Jun 25, 2014
4:13-cv-02783-SBA (N.D. Cal. Jun. 25, 2014)
Case details for

Sharrette v. Credit Suisse International

Case Details

Full title:WILLARD A. SHARRETTE, DAVID GOLDMAN, and ESTA GOLDMAN, Individually and on…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, Oakland Division

Date published: Jun 25, 2014

Citations

4:13-cv-02783-SBA (N.D. Cal. Jun. 25, 2014)