Opinion
Civil Action 23-4843
06-24-2024
BRANDON SHARPE, Plaintiff, v. PRIMEX GARDEN CENTER, MARSHALL GREEN, KATELYN GINSBERG, DANNY GINSBERG AND JAMIE KARNIK, Defendants.
ORDER
WENDY BEETLESTONE, J.
AND NOW, this 24th day of June, 2024, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to
Dismiss (ECF No. 18), Plaintiff's Response in Opposition (ECF No. 21), and Defendants' Reply (ECF No. 21), Defendants' Motion is HEREBY GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN
PART. Defendants' Motion is GRANTED with respect to:
1. Plaintiffs' claims against Defendants Katelyn Ginsberg and Danny Ginsberg which are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
2. Plaintiff's claims for violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., which are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
3. Plaintiff's claims for retaliation in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (“PHRA”) which are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
4. Plaintiffs' claims of a hostile work environment under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and the PHRA which are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
5. Plaintiffs' claim of violation of Section 955(e) of the PHRA against Defendant Marshall Green which is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Defendants' Motion is DENIED in all other respects.