From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sharpe v. Humphrey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION
Apr 16, 2012
NO. 7:12-CV-30 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Apr. 16, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 7:12-CV-30 (HL)

04-16-2012

ROBERT ARNOLD SHARPE, JR., Petitioner, v. Warden CARL HUMPHREY, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner ROBERT ARNOLD SHARPE, JR. filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. After this Court twice ordered Petitioner to state whether he exhausted his state remedies, Petitioner filed a motion to dismiss this action (Doc. 12).

Under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a petitioner may voluntarily his action "before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment[.]" Respondent has not yet served an answer or a motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, Petitioner's motion to dismiss is hereby GRANTED and the above-captioned action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

Petitioner's pending motion to appoint counsel is DENIED AS MOOT (Doc. 10).

____________

HUGH LAWSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
cr


Summaries of

Sharpe v. Humphrey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION
Apr 16, 2012
NO. 7:12-CV-30 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Apr. 16, 2012)
Case details for

Sharpe v. Humphrey

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT ARNOLD SHARPE, JR., Petitioner, v. Warden CARL HUMPHREY, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION

Date published: Apr 16, 2012

Citations

NO. 7:12-CV-30 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Apr. 16, 2012)