From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sharpe v. Cryer

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 20, 2021
1:19-cv-00711-DAD-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2021)

Opinion

1:19-cv-00711-DAD-EPG (PC)

09-20-2021

ADAM SHARPE, Plaintiff, v. C. CRYER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO MAIL FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO PLAINTIFF

(ECF Nos. 71, 72)

Plaintiff Adam Sharpe is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the Court is Plaintiff's “notice of non-delivery of important documents.” (ECF No. 72). In this filing, Plaintiff states that he has learned from “family correspond[e]nce, ” and later, from “legal library paging procedure” that this Court issued findings and recommendations, recommending the denial of Defendants' motion for summary judgment. (Id. at 1). However, Plaintiff states that he has not yet received a copy of the findings and recommendations and requests that he be provided a courtesy copy. (Id. at 2).

Given Plaintiffs representation that he has not yet received a copy of this Court's findings and recommendations, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail Plaintiff a courtesy copy of this Court's September 1, 2021 findings and recommendations. (See ECF No. 71).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sharpe v. Cryer

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 20, 2021
1:19-cv-00711-DAD-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2021)
Case details for

Sharpe v. Cryer

Case Details

Full title:ADAM SHARPE, Plaintiff, v. C. CRYER, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 20, 2021

Citations

1:19-cv-00711-DAD-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2021)