Opinion
20-cv-13172
02-10-2022
Anthony Sharpe, Plaintiff, v. City of Southfield, et al., Defendant
Mag. Judge David R. Grand
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [34]
JUDITH E. LEVY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Before the Court is Magistrate Judge David R. Grand's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 34) recommending the Court grant in part and deny in part the motion for judgment on the pleadings filed by Defendants the City of Southfield, the Southfield Police Department, William Pieroni, Christopher Don, Steven Hendricks, and Joseph Martinez. (ECF No. 19.) The parties were required to file specific written objections, if any, within fourteen days of service. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(2); E.D. Mich. LR 72.1(d). No objections were filed. The Court has nevertheless carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation and concurs in the reasoning and result. Accordingly,
The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 34) is ADOPTED;
Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings (ECF No. 19) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; and
Plaintiff Anthony Sharpe's excessive force claim against Pieroni, Don, Hendricks, and Martinez proceeds; however, all of Plaintiffs other claims are DISMISSED, including his Monell claim against the City of Southfield and the Southfield Police Department.
By failing to object to the Report and Recommendation, the parties have forfeited any further right of appeal. See United States v. Wandahsega, 924 F.3d 868, 878 (6th Cir. 2019); see also Berkshire v. Beauvais, 928 F.3d 520, 530 (6th Cir. 2019).
IT IS SO ORDERED.