From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sharp v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 4, 2017
No. 2:17-cv-0492 JAM CKD PS (E.D. Cal. May. 4, 2017)

Opinion

No. 2:17-cv-0492 JAM CKD PS

05-04-2017

CALYSTA SHARP, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed March 15, 2017, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Failure to file objections ///// ///// within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: May 4, 2017

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 4 sharp0492.fta


Summaries of

Sharp v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 4, 2017
No. 2:17-cv-0492 JAM CKD PS (E.D. Cal. May. 4, 2017)
Case details for

Sharp v. United States

Case Details

Full title:CALYSTA SHARP, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 4, 2017

Citations

No. 2:17-cv-0492 JAM CKD PS (E.D. Cal. May. 4, 2017)