From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sharp v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Oct 11, 2017
No. 71947 (Nev. App. Oct. 11, 2017)

Opinion

No. 71947

10-11-2017

MARK LEONARD SHARP, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

Mark Leonard Sharp appeals from a district court order denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence. Sixth Judicial District Court, Humboldt County; Michael Montero, Judge.

This appeal has been submitted for decision without oral argument. NRAP 34(f)(3). --------

In his motion, Sharp claimed his sentence was illegal because the Humboldt County District Attorney had not posted a bond as required by NRS 252.030, NRS 252.070, NRS 282.010, or NRS 282.163.

A motion to correct an illegal sentence may only challenge the facial legality of the sentence: either the district court was without jurisdiction to impose a sentence or the sentence was imposed in excess of the statutory maximum. Edwards v. State, 112 Nev. 704, 708, 918 P.2d 321, 324 (1996).

Without considering the merits of Sharp's claim, we conclude it falls outside the narrow scope of claims permissible in a motion to correct an illegal sentence and, therefore, the district court did not err by denying his motion. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

/s/_________, C.J.

Silver

/s/_________, J.

Tao

/s/_________, J.

Gibbons cc: Hon. Michael Montero, District Judge

Mark Leonard Sharp

Attorney General/Carson City

Humboldt County District Attorney

Humboldt County Clerk


Summaries of

Sharp v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Oct 11, 2017
No. 71947 (Nev. App. Oct. 11, 2017)
Case details for

Sharp v. State

Case Details

Full title:MARK LEONARD SHARP, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Oct 11, 2017

Citations

No. 71947 (Nev. App. Oct. 11, 2017)