From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sharp v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Oct 15, 2014
No. 65347 (Nev. Oct. 15, 2014)

Opinion

No. 65347

10-15-2014

MARK LEONARD SHARP, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction, pursuant to a guilty plea, of trafficking in a controlled substance (level II). Sixth Judicial District Court, Humboldt County; Michael Montero, Judge.

Appellant's sole argument on appeal is that the district court abused its discretion by sentencing him to a lengthy term of imprisonment (62 to 156 months) because he is "an affable 58 year old man who had served 536 days in the Humboldt County Jail prior to his sentencing in this case" and deserves a lesser sentence. We have consistently afforded the district court wide discretion in its sentencing decision, see, e.g., Houk v. State, 103 Nev. 659, 664, 747 P.2d 1376, 1379 (1987), and will refrain from interfering with the sentence imposed by the district court "[s]o long as the record does not demonstrate prejudice resulting from consideration of information or accusations founded on facts supported only by impalpable or highly suspect evidence," Silks v. State, 92 Nev. 91, 94, 545 P.2d 1159, 1161 (1976). Here, the district court considered appellant's mitigation evidence, including his brother's testimony and letters appellant submitted to the court. The district court was also aware that appellant had incurred a prior felony conviction for trafficking in a controlled substance (level II) 17 years before sentencing in this case—the same crime to which he pleaded guilty in this case—and several misdemeanor convictions. The district court expressly based its sentencing decision "upon the evidence that has been presented and the evidence presented by [appellant's brother]." Because appellant has not demonstrated that the district court abused its discretion in sentencing him, we

The judgment of conviction indicates that appellant received 542 days' credit for time served.

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

/s/_________, J.

Pickering

/s/_________, J.

Parraguirre

/s/_________, J.

Saitta
cc: Hon. Michael Montero, District Judge

Hy Forgeron

Theodore C. Herrera

Attorney General/Carson City

Humboldt County District Attorney

Humboldt County Clerk


Summaries of

Sharp v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Oct 15, 2014
No. 65347 (Nev. Oct. 15, 2014)
Case details for

Sharp v. State

Case Details

Full title:MARK LEONARD SHARP, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Oct 15, 2014

Citations

No. 65347 (Nev. Oct. 15, 2014)