From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sharp v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Apr 19, 1927
112 So. 460 (Ala. Crim. App. 1927)

Opinion

8 Div. 516.

April 19, 1927.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lauderdale County; Norman Gunn, Special Judge.

Benton Sharp was convicted of manufacturing prohibited liquor, and he appeals. Affirmed.

Mitchell Hughston, of Florence, for appellant.

Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., for the State.

No briefs reached the Reporter.


The mere presence of a person at a still where whisky is being manufactured is not sufficient upon which to predicate a conviction. But, where the presence is shown, and the person does any act, or speaks any word, indicating ownership, possession, joint or several, or from which a legal inference could be drawn that defendant was aiding or abetting in the possession of the still or the manufacture of the whisky then being made, the question of guilt is properly submitted to the jury. Elmore v. State, 21 Ala. App. 410, 109 So. 114.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Sharp v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Apr 19, 1927
112 So. 460 (Ala. Crim. App. 1927)
Case details for

Sharp v. State

Case Details

Full title:SHARP v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Apr 19, 1927

Citations

112 So. 460 (Ala. Crim. App. 1927)
22 Ala. App. 81

Citing Cases

State v. Drach

" See IA Wigmore on Evidence §§ 143 and 144 (2d ed. 1983); Ott v. State, 160 Ala. 29, 49 So. 810 (1909);…

Barnett v. State

The motion for new trial was properly overruled. McFarland v. State, 22 Ala. App. 608, 609, 118 So. 500;…