Opinion
2:22-cv-00946-JCM-EJY
11-28-2022
MORIEL R. SHARP, Plaintiff, v. GEICO ADVANTAGE INSURANCE COMPANY, and DOES I-X, and ROE CORPORATIONS I-X, inclusive, Defendants.
HANRATTY LAW GROUP Levin M. Hanratty, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff Morici R. Sharp McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP Jonathan W. Carlson Nevada Bar No. I 0536 Frank A Toddre, II Nevada Bar No. 11474 Henry H Kim Nevada Bar No. 14390 Attomeys for Defendant GEICO Advantage Insurance Company
HANRATTY LAW GROUP
Levin M. Hanratty, Esq.
Attorney for Plaintiff Morici R. Sharp
McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP
Jonathan W. Carlson
Nevada Bar No. I 0536
Frank A Toddre, II
Nevada Bar No. 11474
Henry H Kim
Nevada Bar No. 14390
Attomeys for Defendant GEICO Advantage Insurance Company
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties above named, by and through their respective counsel of record, that the above-entitled matter be dismissed with prejudice.
Re: Moriel R. Sharp v. GEICO
Case No. 2:22-cv-00946-JCM-EJY
Each party will bear their own costs and attorney's fees.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.