From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sharma v. Santander Bank

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 28, 2022
Civil Action 22-826 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 28, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 22-826

06-28-2022

DEEPAK SHARMA et al. v. SANTANDER BANK, N.A.


ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS AND TO STRIKE

MICHAEL M. BAYLSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

AND NOW, this 28th day of June, 2022, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) and to Strike Plaintiffs' Jury Demand Pursuant to Rule 12(f) (ECF 7), Plaintiffs' Response in Opposition (ECF 10), and Defendant's Reply (ECF 11), and for the reasons stated in the foregoing Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED without prejudice. Plaintiffs' breach of implied warranty and negligent infliction of emotional distress claims (Counts II & III) are dismissed without prejudice with leave to amend.
2. Defendant's Motion to Strike is DENIED without prejudice.


Summaries of

Sharma v. Santander Bank

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 28, 2022
Civil Action 22-826 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 28, 2022)
Case details for

Sharma v. Santander Bank

Case Details

Full title:DEEPAK SHARMA et al. v. SANTANDER BANK, N.A.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 28, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 22-826 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 28, 2022)