From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sharbowski v. Utica Cmty. Sch.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Apr 18, 2012
No. 11-cv-13092 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 18, 2012)

Opinion

No. 11-cv-13092

04-18-2012

TROY SHARBOWSKI, a minor, and GINA SHARBOWSKI, Plaintiffs, v. UTICA COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, and JANE AND JOHN DOES, Defendants.


Paul D. Borman

United States District Judge


Laurie J. Michelson

United States Magistrate Judge


ORDER (1) ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION (DKT. NO. 32): (2) GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR

JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (DKT. NOS. 16. 22): and

(3) DISMISSING THE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE

On February 16, 2012, Magistrate Judge Laurie Michelson entered a Report and Recommendation to grant Defendants Utica Community Schools ("UCS") and the Michigan Department of Education's ("MDE") motions for judgment on the pleadings and to dismiss the case in its entirety without prejudice. (Dkt. No. 32.) Magistrate Judge Michelson's Report further recommended that the Court "stay[] the two year statute of limitations under 34 C.F.R. § 300.507 to permit Plaintiffs to bring this cause of action within 90 calendar days from the date of the decision of the ALJ in any future due process proceeding." (Dkt. No. 32, 9 n.4.)

Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and there being no timely objections from either party under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich L. R. 72.1 (d), the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation, GRANTS Defendants' motions for judgment on the pleadings, and DISMISSES the case WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

Plaintiffs did not file objections to the Report and Recommendation but did file a "request" that the Court "stay" or "suspend" the case while Plaintiffs pursue administrative remedies, to relieve Plaintiffs of the obligation of paying a filing fee upon refiling their claims following administrative proceedings. (Dkt. No. 33, Plaintiffs' Notice of Filed Due Process Complaint and Request, 2.) The Court declines this request but will consider any application to proceed in forma pauperis at the time of any refiling.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________________

PAUL D. BORMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Sharbowski v. Utica Cmty. Sch.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Apr 18, 2012
No. 11-cv-13092 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 18, 2012)
Case details for

Sharbowski v. Utica Cmty. Sch.

Case Details

Full title:TROY SHARBOWSKI, a minor, and GINA SHARBOWSKI, Plaintiffs, v. UTICA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 18, 2012

Citations

No. 11-cv-13092 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 18, 2012)

Citing Cases

Clayton v. Kroopnick

However, the Supreme Court made clear that it did not reach the alternative argument “whether IDEA entitles…