Plaintiff must clearly show that he is entitled to benefits under the plain terms of the CFP plan. See Shapiro v. Fid. Invs. Institutional Operations Co., Inc., 142 F.Supp.3d 535, 541 (E.D. Ky. 2015) (citing Gore v. El Paso Energy Corp. Long Term Disability Plan, 477 F.3d 833, 842 (6th Cir.2007)). Plaintiff simply fails to set out allegations that satisfy this showing, and the attachments to his response in opposition to the motion fail to shed any light on the matter.