From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shapira v. Charles Schwab Co. Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 15, 2002
02 Civ. 0425 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 15, 2002)

Opinion

02 Civ. 0425 (LAK)

October 15, 2002


ORDER


Defendant Charles Schwab Co., Inc. ("Schwab") moves for reconsideration of the Court's ruling on its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, arguing that the state and city anti-discrimination laws upon which plaintiff bases his case do not apply in these circumstances, essentially for the reason implicit in footnote 3 of the Court's opinion.

The purpose of a motion for reconsideration is to invite review of a ruling on the ground that the Court overlooked material facts or authorities. S.D.N.Y. Civ.R. 6.3. It is not to seek a different outcome on the basis of an argument that was not made in the first place.

The argument Schwab now makes was not advanced in support of its motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, the motion for reconsideration is denied. Schwab of course remains free to seek to raise the issue by other appropriate means.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Shapira v. Charles Schwab Co. Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 15, 2002
02 Civ. 0425 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 15, 2002)
Case details for

Shapira v. Charles Schwab Co. Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GUY SHAPIRA, Plaintiff, v. CHARLES SCHWAB CO., INC., et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Oct 15, 2002

Citations

02 Civ. 0425 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 15, 2002)

Citing Cases

Belling v. Tallarico

Sacerdote v. New York Univ., 9 F.4th 95, 118 n.94 (2d Cir. 2021) (quoting Shrader v. CSX Transp., Inc., 70…