From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shannon v. Com

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 17, 2007
258 F. App'x 583 (4th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 07-1414.

Submitted: December 13, 2007.

Decided: December 17, 2007.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:06-cv-00413-JRS).

Curtis McKinley Hairston, Jr., The Gee Law Firm, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Robert F. McDonnell, Attorney General of Virginia, Maureen Riley Matsen, Deputy Attorney General, Peter R. Messitt, Senior Assistant Attorney General/Chief, Gregory C. Fleming, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Andrew Shannon appeals the district court's order granting Defendant's summary judgment motion on his retaliation claim brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. See Shannon v. Virginia Dep't of Juvenile Justice, No. 3:06-cv-00413-JRS, 2007 WL 1071973 (E.D.Va. Apr. 4, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Shannon v. Com

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 17, 2007
258 F. App'x 583 (4th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

Shannon v. Com

Case Details

Full title:Andrew SHANNON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Dec 17, 2007

Citations

258 F. App'x 583 (4th Cir. 2007)

Citing Cases

Shannon v. Virginia Dep't of Juvenile Justice

Andrew SHANNON, petitioner, v. VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE.Case below, 258 Fed.Appx. 583.…

Hairston v. Barnes

Regarding Plaintiff's email issues, courts have consistently held that "close scrutiny, monitoring, or…