Summary
In Shanks v. D., L. W.R.R. (supra) the defendant was engaged in both interstate and intrastate transportation. It conducted a machine shop for the repair of locomotives used in such transportation.
Summary of this case from Hiser v. DavisOpinion
6:17-CV-719 (DNH/TWD)
09-21-2017
BRADFORD L. SHANKS, Plaintiff, v. BRIAN D. BURNS, Presiding Judge; JOHN MUEHL, District Attorney; and OTSEGO COUNTY, County Manager/Clerk, Defendants.
APPEARANCES: BRADFORD L. SHANKS Plaintiff pro se 12 Fonda Avenue Oneonta, NY 13820
APPEARANCES: BRADFORD L. SHANKS
Plaintiff pro se
12 Fonda Avenue
Oneonta, NY 13820 DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER
Pro se plaintiff Bradford L. Shanks brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 24, 2017, the Honorable Therese Wiley Dancks, United States Magistrate Judge, advised by Report-Recommendation that plaintiff's complaint be dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon initial review. No objections to the Report-Recommendation have been filed.
Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
Therefore, it is
ORDERED that
1. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice; and
2. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/_________
United States District Judge Dated: September 21, 2017
Utica, New York.