From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shanklin v. Young

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 16, 2005
No. CIV S-05-1420 FCD KJM PS (E.D. Cal. Dec. 16, 2005)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-1420 FCD KJM PS.

December 16, 2005


FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS


By order filed October 27, 2005, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within ten days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order.Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Shanklin v. Young

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 16, 2005
No. CIV S-05-1420 FCD KJM PS (E.D. Cal. Dec. 16, 2005)
Case details for

Shanklin v. Young

Case Details

Full title:RONALD SHANKLIN, Plaintiff, v. DAVID YOUNG, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 16, 2005

Citations

No. CIV S-05-1420 FCD KJM PS (E.D. Cal. Dec. 16, 2005)