Opinion
2011-11-15
John J. Marafino, Mount Vernon, for appellant. John R. Eyerman, New York, for respondent.
John J. Marafino, Mount Vernon, for appellant. John R. Eyerman, New York, for respondent. Cozen O'Connor, New York (Kenneth G. Roberts of counsel), attorney for the children.ANDRIAS, J.P., FRIEDMAN, DeGRASSE, FREEDMAN, MANZANET–DANIELS, JJ.
Orders of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Douglas E. Hoffman, J.), entered on or about November 23, 2009, which, upon a fact-finding of permanent neglect, terminated respondent mother's parental rights to the subject children and committed the guardianship and custody of the children to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of the Administration for Children's Services for the purposes of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The finding of permanent neglect is supported by clear and convincing evidence that respondent failed substantially and continuously to maintain contact with or plan for the future of her children despite the diligent efforts by both agencies involved in this case to strengthen her bond with the children ( see Social Services Law § 384–b[7][a], [f]; Matter of Sheila G., 61 N.Y.2d 368, 474 N.Y.S.2d 421, 462 N.E.2d 1139 [1984] ). The agencies provided referrals for appropriate services, made suitable arrangements for visitation, and referred respondent for additional services when it became clear that she was unable to manage the children, who have special needs. However, respondent missed more than half of her scheduled visits and appeared late for most of the remainder ( see Matter of Gin Ho S., 192 A.D.2d 466, 596 N.Y.S.2d 414 [1993] ).
A preponderance of the evidence establishes that it was in the best interests of the children to terminate respondent's parental rights to them ( see Matter of Khalil A. [Sabree A.], 84 A.D.3d 632, 923 N.Y.S.2d 107 [2011] ). The children have been residing in a stable and nurturing environment with their foster mother, who is willing and able to adopt them ( see Matter of Fernando Alexander B. [Simone Anita W.], 85 A.D.3d 658, 925 N.Y.S.2d 823 [2011] ). In view of the foregoing, a suspended judgment was not appropriate.