From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shandon Valley Transp. Solutions USA, LLC v. Design Pallets, Inc.

DISTRICT COURT, DENVER, COLORADO
Jul 23, 2012
Case Number: 2011CV8782 (D. Colo. Jul. 23, 2012)

Opinion

Case Number: 2011CV8782

07-23-2012

SHANDON VALLEY TRANSPORT SOLUTIONS, USA, LLC, Plaintiff. v. DESIGN PALLETS, INC, Defendant.


EFILED Document

CO Denver County District Court 2nd JD

Filing Date: Jun 7 2012 2:41PM MDT

Filing ID: 44690333

Review Clerk: Kari S Elizalde

COURT USE ONLY


COURT'S ORDER RE: DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS

This matter is before the Court pursuant to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, filed May 8, 2012. The Court having reviewed the Motion, the file and being fully advised Finds and Orders as follows:

Defendant has moved to dismiss this action based on a forum selection clause contained in a contract between the parties. The clause provides that any action arising out of the contract "may be brought in any Florida state court or United States federal court located in the Middle District of Florida" (emphasis added). The contract also contains a choice of law provision selecting Florida law.

A forum applies its own law to procedural issues, even when the parties have agreed in advance that some other state's laws apply to substantive issues. E.g., Rest. (2d) on the Conflict of Laws § 122. The enforceability of a forum selection clause is a procedural issue. Therefore, Colorado law applies.

Parties seeking to enforce a forum selection clause via a Motion to Dismiss must first establish the existence of a forum selection clause. Then, the burden shifts to the nonmoving party to show that the forum selection clause is unfair, unreasonable, or fraudulently induced. Edge Telecom, Inc. v. Sterling Bank, 143 P.3d 1155 (Colo. App. 2005).

The contract's forum selection clause is facially ambiguous. It is unclear whether it is permissive or mandatory. The drafter's use of the permissive "may" with the exclusive "or" results in differing, reasonable interpretations. Consequently, Defendant has not established that a valid forum selection clause "exists" under Edge Telecom.

1. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED.
2. Each party to pay their own fees and costs.

BY THE COURT:

________________

Herbert L. Stern, III

District Court Judge
CC: Counsel of Record by e-filing


Summaries of

Shandon Valley Transp. Solutions USA, LLC v. Design Pallets, Inc.

DISTRICT COURT, DENVER, COLORADO
Jul 23, 2012
Case Number: 2011CV8782 (D. Colo. Jul. 23, 2012)
Case details for

Shandon Valley Transp. Solutions USA, LLC v. Design Pallets, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SHANDON VALLEY TRANSPORT SOLUTIONS, USA, LLC, Plaintiff. v. DESIGN…

Court:DISTRICT COURT, DENVER, COLORADO

Date published: Jul 23, 2012

Citations

Case Number: 2011CV8782 (D. Colo. Jul. 23, 2012)