From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shamrock Monitoring v. Durag, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 10, 1999
745 So. 2d 451 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 98-2862.

Opinion filed November 10, 1999.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Ronald M. Friedman, Judge, L.T. No. 98-1367.

Wald, Stafford Wald and Stormie Stafford, for appellant.

Robert Cooper and Mark Bodner, for appellee.

Before NESBITT, COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.


We conclude that the evidence is sufficient to support the trial court's finding, after bench trial, that the appellant successor corporation is a mere continuation of the predecessor corporation, see Amjad Munim, M.D., P.A., v. Azar, 648 So.2d 145, 154 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994), and that the question of the ownership of the Total Bank account presented a triable issue. See Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So.2d 13, 16 (Fla. 1976). The appellee judgment creditor concedes that there are two factual errors in the final judgment, but appellee argues, and we agree, that the errors are not material to the ultimate conclusion. We have carefully considered appellant's arguments to the contrary, but are not persuaded thereby.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Shamrock Monitoring v. Durag, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 10, 1999
745 So. 2d 451 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Shamrock Monitoring v. Durag, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SHAMROCK MONITORING, INC., Appellant, vs. DURAG, INC., Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Nov 10, 1999

Citations

745 So. 2d 451 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)