From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shamis v. Solil Mgmt.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 23, 2022
20-CV-7064 (VSB)(OTW) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 23, 2022)

Opinion

20-CV-7064 (VSB)(OTW)

12-23-2022

ILONA SHAMIS, Plaintiff, v. SOLIL MANAGEMENT, LLC, and JANE GOLDMAN, individual and as Officer of SOLIL MANAGEMENT, LLC, JOHN DOE 1-5, and DOE CORPORATIONS 1-5, Defendants.


ORDER

VERNON S. BRODERICK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff Ilona Shamis brings this action seeking damages for unpaid wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act (the “FLSA”) and New York Labor Law (the “NYLL”), as well as violations of the Wage Theft Prevention Act of the NYLL. (Doc. 39, at 1.) On July 12, 2021, the parties reported that they had reached a settlement, which was submitted to me for approval pursuant to Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2015). (See Doc. 39.) I referred the action to Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang for a report and recommendation. (Docs. 41, 42.)

Before me is Judge Wang's Report & Recommendation dated December 1, 2022. (Doc. 43.) It recommends awarding Plaintiff $1,346.16, and Plaintiff's counsel $673.08 in attorneys' fees for a total sum of $2,019.24. (Id. 2-3)

A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). “To accept the report and recommendation of a magistrate, to which no timely objection has been made, a district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record.” Nelson v. Smith, 618 F.Supp. 1186, 1189 (S.D.N.Y. 1985). The Parties no object to the Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 45.) Accordingly, I have reviewed Judge Wang's thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation for clear error and, after careful review, find none.

I therefore agree with Judge Wang's conclusion that the parties' proposed settlement is fair and reasonable, and so adopt the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. The parties' settlement agreement, including the settlement amount, is APPROVED.

The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close all outstanding motions on this docket.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Shamis v. Solil Mgmt.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 23, 2022
20-CV-7064 (VSB)(OTW) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 23, 2022)
Case details for

Shamis v. Solil Mgmt.

Case Details

Full title:ILONA SHAMIS, Plaintiff, v. SOLIL MANAGEMENT, LLC, and JANE GOLDMAN…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 23, 2022

Citations

20-CV-7064 (VSB)(OTW) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 23, 2022)