From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shamie v. Grossman

Michigan Court of Appeals
May 25, 1971
190 N.W.2d 734 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971)

Opinion

Docket No. 9749.

Decided May 25, 1971.

Appeal from Oakland, James S. Thorburn, J. Submitted Division 2 May 11, 1971, at Lansing. (Docket No. 9749.) Decided May 25, 1971.

Complaint by Terry Shamie, administratrix of the estate of Jack Shamie, against Harry Grossman and J. Leonard Hyman for payment of a promissory note. Accelerated judgment for defendants. Plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

John Cozart, Jr., for plaintiff.

Hyman Rice, for defendants.

Before: DANHOF, P.J., and FITZGERALD and QUINN, JJ.


Plaintiff filed an action on the promissory note of defendants. They moved for accelerated judgment on the basis of payment, GCR 1963, 116.1(5), and supported the motion with an appropriate affidavit. Although afforded ample opportunity by way of amendment and discovery, plaintiff did not rebut the allegations of payment contained in defendants' affidavit, and accelerated judgment in their favor entered.

The trial judge was justified in accepting the facts stated in defendants' affidavit as true, People, ex rel. Thornton Construction Company, Inc., v. United States Fidelity Guaranty Company (1967), 8 Mich. App. 540. Those facts support a finding of payment.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Shamie v. Grossman

Michigan Court of Appeals
May 25, 1971
190 N.W.2d 734 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971)
Case details for

Shamie v. Grossman

Case Details

Full title:SHAMIE v. GROSSMAN

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: May 25, 1971

Citations

190 N.W.2d 734 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971)
190 N.W.2d 734

Citing Cases

Empire Shoe v. Gershenson

Statements of fact contained in the affidavits which are not rebutted by the opposing party's affidavit may…