From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shaleli v. Blinken

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 27, 2022
1:22-cv-01244-JLT-SAB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2022)

Opinion

1:22-cv-01244-JLT-SAB

10-27-2022

KHALIL MUSLEH ABDO AL SHALELI, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ANTONY J. BLINKEN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(A) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE (ECF NO. 19)

On October 26, 2022, Plaintiff filed a notice of dismissal. (ECF No. 19.) In light of the notice of dismissal, this action has been terminated, Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed without prejudice.

Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY DIRECTED to close the case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Shaleli v. Blinken

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 27, 2022
1:22-cv-01244-JLT-SAB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2022)
Case details for

Shaleli v. Blinken

Case Details

Full title:KHALIL MUSLEH ABDO AL SHALELI, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ANTONY J. BLINKEN…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 27, 2022

Citations

1:22-cv-01244-JLT-SAB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2022)