From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shakur v. Stewart

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 19, 2003
59 F. App'x 944 (9th Cir. 2003)

Opinion


59 Fed.Appx. 944 (9th Cir. 2003) Amin Rahman SHAKUR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Terry L. STEWART; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 02-17097. D.C. No. CV-01-02470-PGR. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. March 19, 2003

Submitted March 10, 2003.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Paul G. Rosenblatt, District Judge, Presiding.

Before CANBY, O'SCANNLAIN, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Arizona state prisoner Amin Rahman Shakur appeals pro se the district court's order denying his motion to recuse the district court judge from his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violation of the First Amendment. We lack jurisdiction over this interlocutory order. See Arizona v. Ideal Basic Indust. ( In re Cement Antitrust Litigation), 673 F.2d 1020, 1022-25 (9th Cir.1982).

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Shakur v. Stewart

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 19, 2003
59 F. App'x 944 (9th Cir. 2003)
Case details for

Shakur v. Stewart

Case Details

Full title:Amin Rahman SHAKUR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Terry L. STEWART; et al.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 19, 2003

Citations

59 F. App'x 944 (9th Cir. 2003)