From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shahzad v. Gurule

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Feb 24, 2014
No. CV13-1176 PHX DGC (MEA) (D. Ariz. Feb. 24, 2014)

Opinion

No. CV13-1176 PHX DGC (MEA)

02-24-2014

Mehar Khurram Shahzad, Petitioner, v. John Gurule, Field Office Director, Arizona, Respondents.


ORDER

Petitioner Mehar Khurram Shahzad has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 alleging that his continued detention without a bond hearing violated federal law and Petitioner's constitutional rights. Doc. 1. Petitioner subsequently filed a motion for bond hearing. Doc. 24. United States Magistrate Mark E. Aspey has issued a report and recommendation ("R&R") recommending that the motion for bond hearing be denied and this matter be dismissed. Doc. 27. No objection has been filed, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review the R&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). The Court will accept the R&R and deny the petition.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The R&R (Doc. 27) is accepted.

2. Petitioner's motion for bond hearing (Doc. 24) is denied.

3. A certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are denied

4. The Clerk is directed to terminate this action.

__________

David G. Campbell

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Shahzad v. Gurule

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Feb 24, 2014
No. CV13-1176 PHX DGC (MEA) (D. Ariz. Feb. 24, 2014)
Case details for

Shahzad v. Gurule

Case Details

Full title:Mehar Khurram Shahzad, Petitioner, v. John Gurule, Field Office Director…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: Feb 24, 2014

Citations

No. CV13-1176 PHX DGC (MEA) (D. Ariz. Feb. 24, 2014)