Shahin v. City of Dover Bd. of Assessment Appeals

8 Citing cases

  1. Shahin v. City of Dover

    No. 354 (Del. Jul. 13, 2023)

    Recognizing that the Shahins had not raised a claim that the City Defendants had violated either the Federal Fair Housing Act or the Delaware Fair Housing Act (DFHA) before their appeal, the Court directed the Shahins to the relevant federal and state statutes that detail the procedures for obtaining relief under those acts.Mazen v. City of Dover Bd. of Assessment Appeals, 2016 WL 520996, at *1 (Del. Super. Ct. Jan. 22, 2016). Id.

  2. Shahin v. City of Dover

    259 A.3d 1272 (Del. 2021)   Cited 1 times

    Shahin v. City of Dover, Del. , 615 Fed. Appx. 739 (3d Cir. 2015).Mazen v. City of Dover Bd. of Assessment Appeals , 2016 WL 520996 (Del. Super. Ct. Jan. 22, 2016).Id. at *4.

  3. Agbemehia v. Del. Bd. of Nursing

    K23A-04-001 RLG (Del. Super. Ct. Jan. 5, 2024)   Cited 1 times

    Mazen v. City of Dover Bd. of Assessment Appeals, 2016 WL 520996, at *4 (Del. Super. Ct. Jan. 22, 2016), affd sub nom. Shahin v. City of Dover Bd. of Assessment Appeals, 149 A.3d 227 (Del. 2016).

  4. In re Del. Pub. Sch. Litig.

    239 A.3d 451 (Del. Ch. 2020)   Cited 12 times
    Explaining "[t]he issue of standing is concerned 'only with the question of who is entitled to mount a legal challenge and not with the merits of the subject matter of the controversy'" and addressing that "state courts apply the concept of standing as a matter of self-restraint to avoid the rendering of advisory opinions at the behest of parties who are mere intermeddlers."

    Super. Apr. 1, 2016), rev'd on other grounds , 159 A.3d at 1209 ; Shahin v. City of Dover Bd. of Assessment Appeals , 2016 WL 520996, at *2 (Del. Super. Jan. 22, 2016), aff'd , 149 A.3d 227 (Del. 2016) (TABLE); RRHC Wilm., LLC v. New Castle Cty. Office of Finance , 2014 WL 2538886, at *8–9 (Del. Super.

  5. Shahin v. City of Dover

    C.A. No. K18C-10-023 WLW (Del. Super. Ct. Dec. 17, 2018)

    In 2014, after Dover's tax assessment, a similar procedural history followed. See Mazen v. City of Dover Bd. of Assessment Appeals, 2016 WL 520996 (Del. Super. Jan. 22, 2016), aff'd sub nom. Shahin v. City of Dover Bd. Of Assessment Appeals, 149 A.3d 227 (Del. 2016). On February 9, 2016, the Plaintiffs filed another complaint against Dover, again alleging housing discrimination, with the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD").

  6. Shahin v. City of Dover

    C.A. No. 2018-0352-JRS (Del. Ch. Sep. 26, 2018)   Cited 4 times

    See Opening Br. at *2. Compl. ¶¶ 5, 6; Mazen v. City of Dover Bd. of Assessment Appeals, No. CV K15A-08-004 WLW, 2016 WL 520996 (Del. Super. Ct. Jan. 22, 2016), aff'd sub nom. Shahin v. City of Dover Bd. of Assessment Appeals, 149 A.3d 227 (Del. 2016).

  7. Purnell v. Dep't of Ins.

    C.A. No. N16A-10-001 JRJ (Del. Super. Ct. Sep. 7, 2017)   Cited 2 times

    Since the issue was not properly raised before the Commissioner, the Court will not address it on appeal. Furthermore, for this reason, to the extent Purnell's other arguments are based on alleged omissions from the transcript, the Court will not consider them. See, e.g., Mazen v. City of Dover Bd. of Assessment Appeals, 2016 WL 520996, at *4 (citing Tatten Partners, L.P. v. New Castle Cty. Bd. of Assessment Review, 642 A.2d 1251, 1262 (Del. Super. Ct. 1993), aff'd sub nom. New Castle Cty. v. Tatten Partners, L.P., 647 A.2d 382 (Del. 1994)). Supplemental Recommended Findings at 4-6.

  8. Young v. Red Clay Consol. Sch. Dist.

    159 A.3d 713 (Del. Ch. 2017)   Cited 9 times

    Using this reasoning, a series of decisions have rejected challenges to valuations based on 1983 values. See, e.g., Mazen v. City of Dover Bd. of Assessment Appeals, 2016 WL 520996, at *2 (Del. Super. Jan. 22, 2016) ; RRHC Wilmington, LLC v. New Castle Cty. Office of Finance, 2014 WL 2538886, at *8–9 (Del. Super. May 30, 2014) ; Bailey v. Bd. of Assessment Review, 2004 WL 1965867, at *5 (Del. Super. Aug. 19, 2004).The uniformity defense might not apply in a case which asserted that New Castle County is currently violating the statutory requirement to value property at its "true value in money" by continuing to use a base year of 1983.