Shafto v. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America

Full title: WILLIAM C. SHAFTO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF…

Court: Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Jul 11, 1949

4 N.J. Super. 451 (App. Div. 1949)

67 A.2d 692

Opinion

Argued April 25, 1949 —

Decided July 11, 1949.

Appeal from Superior Court, Law Division.

Before Judges McGEEHAN, DONGES and COLIE.

Mr. Baruch S. Seidman ( Mr. George L. Burton, attorney) argued the cause for the defendant-appellant. Mr. Theodore D. Parsons ( Messrs. Parsons, Labrecque, Canzona Combs, attorneys) argued the cause for the plaintiff-respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a judgment entered after a jury verdict. We are asked to reverse on the ground that the verdict is so clearly against the weight of evidence as to be without legal justification. To justify a reversal under Rule 1:2-20 it must be clear that the verdict is the result of misake, partiality or prejudice. We do not so find.

The judgment is affirmed.