Opinion
1:21-CV-275-HAB
10-19-2021
DOUGLAS ROBERT SHAFFER, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS J. FELTS, et al., Defendants.
OPINION AND ORDER
HOLLY A. BRADY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
On October 14, 2021, this Court denied Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider and Request for Hearing. (See ECF No. 17). While that order was outbound, an Amended Motion to Reconsider and Request for Hearing was inbound. (ECF No. 18). Plaintiff's motions contain the same arguments; the purpose of the amendment was to attach two exhibits. Unfortunately for Plaintiff, these exhibits do not change the jurisdictional analysis. The Rooker-Feldman doctrine bars Plaintiff's suit for the reasons laid out in the Court's prior orders.
For these reasons, Plaintiff's Amended Motion to Reconsider and Request for Hearing (ECF No. 18) is DENIED.
SO ORDERED.