Opinion
No. 07-6833.
Submitted: July 31, 2008.
Decided: August 4, 2008.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (8:06-cv-02222-PJM).
P. Mark Shafer, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
P. Mark Shafer appeals the district court's order denying his second motion to reopen his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Shafer v. Snook, No. 8:06-cv-02222-PJM (D.Md. May 23, 2007). We deny Shafer's motions to amend his complaint, for appointment of counsel, and for oral argument, and we deny his request for production of documents and for mandamus relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.