From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shafer v. Rutledge

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Jul 20, 2021
Civil Action 2:21-CV-040 (S.D. Tex. Jul. 20, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action 2:21-CV-040

07-20-2021

RICHARD SCOTT SHAFER, et al, Plaintiffs, v. MICHAEL RUTLEDGE, et al, Defendants


ORDER REGARDING REQUEST TO REINSTATE

NELVA GONZALES RAMOS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court dismissed this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute in a final judgment dated May 4, 2021. D.E. 21, 22. Underlying that decision was Petitioner's failure to pay the $400 filing fee after his application to proceed in forma pauperis was denied. On May 7, Petitioner filed objections to the dismissal and a declaration, accompanied by evidence that he had requested a withdrawal from his prisoner trust fund to pay the filing fee but that it had been delayed by the Texas Department of Criminal Justice through no fault of his own. D.E. 24, 25; see also D.E. 31.

ORDERS that Petitioner may reinstate this action by appropriate motion and payment of the filing fee on or before August 31, 2021.

ORDERED.


Summaries of

Shafer v. Rutledge

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Jul 20, 2021
Civil Action 2:21-CV-040 (S.D. Tex. Jul. 20, 2021)
Case details for

Shafer v. Rutledge

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD SCOTT SHAFER, et al, Plaintiffs, v. MICHAEL RUTLEDGE, et al…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Texas

Date published: Jul 20, 2021

Citations

Civil Action 2:21-CV-040 (S.D. Tex. Jul. 20, 2021)