From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shafer Elec. & Constr. v. Mantia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Oct 29, 2013
78 A.3d 1043 (Pa. 2013)

Opinion

2013-10-29

SHAFER ELECTRIC & CONSTRUCTION, Respondent v. Raymond MANTIA and Donna Mantia, Husband and Wife, Petitioners.


Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court, No. 276 WAL 2013.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of October, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues are:

(1) Whether the Home Improvement Consumer Protection Act, 73 Pa. Stat. §§ 517.1–517.18, bars a contractor from recovery under a theory of quantum meruit in the absence of a valid and enforceable home improvement contract under the Act[.]

(2) Whether the decisions of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania in Shafer Electric & Construction v. Mantia, (Pa.Super.Ct.2013), and Durst v. Milroy, 52 A.3d 357, 2012 PA Super 179 (Pa.Super.Ct.2012), conflict with the Home Improvement Consumer Protection Act, 73 Pa. Stat. §§ 517.7(a) and (g), and should be overturned by this Court[.]


Summaries of

Shafer Elec. & Constr. v. Mantia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Oct 29, 2013
78 A.3d 1043 (Pa. 2013)
Case details for

Shafer Elec. & Constr. v. Mantia

Case Details

Full title:SHAFER ELECTRIC & CONSTRUCTION, Respondent v. Raymond MANTIA and Donna…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Date published: Oct 29, 2013

Citations

78 A.3d 1043 (Pa. 2013)

Citing Cases

Shafer Elec. & Constr. v. Mantia

]Shafer Elec. & Const. v. Mantia, 621 Pa. 400, 78 A.3d 1043, 1043–44 (2013) ( per curiam ). We note that this…