From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shade v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 11, 2006
925 So. 2d 453 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. 1D05-4555.

April 11, 2006.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Hamilton County, John W. Peach, J.

Pro se, Appellant.

Charles Crist, Attorney General, and Sheron Wells, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Appellant challenges the trial court's denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. Appellant alleges three grounds for relief, only one of which has merit. Specifically, Appellant claims the portion of his sentence which requires hard labor is illegal. We agree.

Where a defendant commits his crimes after 1970, a hard labor condition constitutes an illegal sentence. Harris v. State, 902 So.2d 292 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Burney v. State, 705 So.2d 90 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). Consequently, Appellant is entitled to have the condition of hard labor stricken from his sentence. Harris, 902 So.2d at 292; Burney, 705 So.2d at 90.

The case is remanded for the trial court to strike the condition of hard labor from Appellant's sentence. Because this is simply a ministerial act, Appellant's presence is not required. The trial court's order is affirmed in all other respects.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED with directions.

ALLEN, LEWIS, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Shade v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 11, 2006
925 So. 2d 453 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Shade v. State

Case Details

Full title:Edward SHADE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Apr 11, 2006

Citations

925 So. 2d 453 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Citing Cases

Edgecomb v. State

Although we deny relief, as Edgecomb is prohibited from filing any pro se pleadings in the lower tribunal, we…