Opinion
2:15-cv-01016-RFB-PAL
12-01-2015
Rhonda Shade, Lowell Shade Pro Se, Plaintiffs, v. Clark County, City of Las Vegas Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Officers A. Ash #9325, J. Smith #9342, J. Collins # 9322, Det. J. Grimmett #7056, Sgt. McGrath Defendant(s).
Rhonda Shade 50 Emery Street Pahrump, NV 89048 775-419-4497
MOT
Rhonda Shade
50 Emery Street
Pahrump, NV 89048
775-419-4497
MOTION [AND PROPOSED ORDER] TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS
COMES NOW Plaintiffs, Rhonda Shade and Lowell Shade, pro se, and files their Motion [and Proposed Order] to Extend Time to Reply to Defendants Motion To Dismiss filed October 20, 2016. This motion is based on the following memorandum:
MEMORANDUM AND CONCLUSION
Due to the complex nature of the case along with Plaintiff, Rhonda Shade's, current medical condition and distance from Las Vegas, the Plaintiffs are asking for an additional ten days (10) to attempt to retain attorney Cal Potter, III. Plaintiffs have discussed the matter with Mr. Potter and have been acquiring the funds to hire him and his firm. Plaintiffs have the utmost respect for this court and value the courts time. That is the reason Plaintiffs are trying to obtain the appropriate counsel for this matter. Should this request for an additional ten days (10) be granted, Plaintiffs understand such provisions may not be made in the future.
Plaintiffs respectfully request this Court's order extending their time to respond to Defendants Motion to Dismiss, on or before December 11, 2015.
Dated this 1st day of December, 2015.
ORDER
Based upon the above and foregoing,
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/_________
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
December 2, 2015
Respectfully submitted,
/s/
Rhonda Shade, Pro Se
50 Emery Street
Pahrump, NV 89048