From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shaddon v. Comm'r of the Soc. Sec. Admin.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Jul 25, 2012
Case No. 3:11-cv-6150-ST (D. Or. Jul. 25, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 3:11-cv-6150-ST

07-25-2012

DAVID W. SHADDON, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant.

Kathryn Tassinari Robert A. Baron HARDER, WELLS, BARON & MANNING, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff Roberta G. Bowie SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL Summer Stinson SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION Adrian L. Brown U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, DISTRICT OF OREGON Attorneys for Defendants


ORDER

Kathryn Tassinari

Robert A. Baron

HARDER, WELLS, BARON & MANNING, P.C.

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Roberta G. Bowie

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL

Summer Stinson

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

Adrian L. Brown

U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, DISTRICT OF OREGON

Attorneys for Defendants HERNANDEZ, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart issued a Findings and Recommendation (doc. #19) on June 25, 2012, recommending that the final decision of the Social Security Commissioner (the "Commissioner") in connection with Plaintiff's applications for Disability Insurance Benefits ("DIB") under Title II of the Social Security Act (the "Act") and for Supplemental Security Income ("SSI Benefits") under Title XVI of the Act be reversed and remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings and Recommendation (doc. #19). Accordingly, the Commissioner's final decision in connection with Plaintiff's applications for DIB and SSI Benefits is reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

MARCO A. HERNANDEZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Shaddon v. Comm'r of the Soc. Sec. Admin.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Jul 25, 2012
Case No. 3:11-cv-6150-ST (D. Or. Jul. 25, 2012)
Case details for

Shaddon v. Comm'r of the Soc. Sec. Admin.

Case Details

Full title:DAVID W. SHADDON, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Date published: Jul 25, 2012

Citations

Case No. 3:11-cv-6150-ST (D. Or. Jul. 25, 2012)