From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shackelford, Bowen, Mckinley & Norton, LLP v. Peters

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Jun 28, 2024
No. 05-23-00454-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 28, 2024)

Opinion

05-23-00454-CV

06-28-2024

SHACKELFORD, BOWEN, MCKINLEY &NORTON, LLP, CARSON EPES STEINBAUER, WHITLEY PENN, LLP, AND ROBERT METZ, Appellants v. IRINA PETERS AND NICK PETERS, Appellees and IN RE SHACKELFORD, BOWEN, MCKINLEY & NORTON, LLP, CARSON EPES STEINBAUER, WHITLEY PENN, LLP, AND ROBERT METZ, RELATORS


On Appeal from the 417th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 417-50402-2019

Before Justices Reichek, Carlyle, and Miskel

ORDER

AMANDA L. REICHEK JUSTICE

Based on the Court's opinion of this date in this consolidated original proceeding and interlocutory appeal,

We DENY relators' petition for writ of mandamus.


Summaries of

Shackelford, Bowen, Mckinley & Norton, LLP v. Peters

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Jun 28, 2024
No. 05-23-00454-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 28, 2024)
Case details for

Shackelford, Bowen, Mckinley & Norton, LLP v. Peters

Case Details

Full title:SHACKELFORD, BOWEN, MCKINLEY &NORTON, LLP, CARSON EPES STEINBAUER, WHITLEY…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Jun 28, 2024

Citations

No. 05-23-00454-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 28, 2024)