From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shabazz v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 23, 2003
309 A.D.2d 999 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

92427

Decided and Entered: October 23, 2003.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Faheem Shabazz, New York City, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Crew III, J.P., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and, Mugglin, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule which prohibits inmates from attempting to organize a demonstration. The misbehavior report relates that a security staff investigation revealed that petitioner was circulating through the prison population making inflammatory remarks regarding the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 and attempting to organize Muslim inmates to commit acts detrimental to the order of the facility. We reject petitioner's assertion that the misbehavior report was insufficient to adequately apprise him of the charge against him due to the failure to provide him with specifics as to the time and place of the incident. Inasmuch as the charge resulted from an ongoing investigation and involved petitioner's attempt to rally support from various inmates, we find no error in the omission from the misbehavior report of specific dates and times (see Matter of Mays v. Goord, 285 A.D.2d 847, lv denied 97 N.Y.2d 603; Matter of Moore v. Goord, 279 A.D.2d 682). Moreover, testimony at the hearing and confidential information constitute substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt (see Matter of Millan v. Goord, 284 A.D.2d 827). We note that the in camera review of the confidential information confirms that the Hearing Officer made an independent assessment of the reliability and credibility of the information provided (see Matter of Knight v. Goord, 267 A.D.2d 523, lv denied 94 N.Y.2d 760).

Crew III, J.P., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Mugglin, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Shabazz v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 23, 2003
309 A.D.2d 999 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Shabazz v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF FAHEEM SHABAZZ, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 23, 2003

Citations

309 A.D.2d 999 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
766 N.Y.S.2d 150

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Annucci

Williams v. Fischer, 114 AD3d 977 (citation omitted). See also Meachem v. Fischer, 108 AD3d 973, Kornegay v.…

Meachem v. Fischer

Initially, we reject petitioner's claim that the misbehavior report did not provide him with adequate notice…