From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

S&H Sys. v. Bespoke Mfg. Co.

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Nov 25, 2024
3:24-cv-151-DPM (E.D. Ark. Nov. 25, 2024)

Opinion

3:24-cv-151-DPM

11-25-2024

S&H SYSTEMS, INC. PLAINTIFF v. BESPOKE MANUFACTURING COMPANY LLC DEFENDANT


ORDER

D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge

Motion for default judgment, Doc. 12, noted. The record presented does not establish good service on Bespoke. The proof of service, Doc. 5, does not specify whether the process server was eighteen years or older. Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(c)(2). It does not state whether a copy of the complaint was served with the summons. Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(c)(1). It's also a bit unclear whether Finkbiner works for Bespoke or Bespoke's registered agent, First Corporate Solutions, Inc., and whether she's authorized to receive process, though her job title implies she is. The Court would appreciate clarification. The process server's affidavit is simply too thin. Amended proof of service due by 6 December 2024. Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(1)(1) & (3). In the circumstances, the Court will extend the time for service on Bespoke if necessary. Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m).

So Ordered.


Summaries of

S&H Sys. v. Bespoke Mfg. Co.

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Nov 25, 2024
3:24-cv-151-DPM (E.D. Ark. Nov. 25, 2024)
Case details for

S&H Sys. v. Bespoke Mfg. Co.

Case Details

Full title:S&H SYSTEMS, INC. PLAINTIFF v. BESPOKE MANUFACTURING COMPANY LLC DEFENDANT

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Nov 25, 2024

Citations

3:24-cv-151-DPM (E.D. Ark. Nov. 25, 2024)