S.G.M. v. C.B.D.

Full title: S.G.M., Respondent, v. C.B.D., Appellant.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Date published: Oct 20, 2020

609 S.W.3d 108 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. ED 108673

10-20-2020

S.G.M., Respondent, v. C.B.D., Appellant.

For Appellant: Steven A. Waterkotte, 7750 Clayton Rd., Ste. 209, St. Louis, MO 63117. For Respondent: Michael D. Lowry, Tim Pudlowski, P.O. Box 238, Hillsboro, MO 63050.

PER CURIAM.

For Appellant: Steven A. Waterkotte, 7750 Clayton Rd., Ste. 209, St. Louis, MO 63117.

For Respondent: Michael D. Lowry, Tim Pudlowski, P.O. Box 238, Hillsboro, MO 63050.

Before Angela T. Quigless, P.J., Kurt S. Odenwald, J., and James M. Dowd, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM C.B.D. ("Respondent") appeals from the judgment of the circuit court granting a full order of protection to S.G.M. ("Petitioner"). On appeal, Respondent first argues that Petitioner failed to prove that Respondent undertook an unwanted course of conduct with no legitimate purpose towards Petitioner. Respondent next contends that her actions did not cause alarm to Petitioner.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).