Opinion
2:22-cv-00507-RFB-EJY
04-05-2023
WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP Christina V. Miller, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant, PHH Mortgage Corporation HANKS LAW GROUP Karen L. Hanks, Esq. Chantel M. Schimming, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff, SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC
WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP Christina V. Miller, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant, PHH Mortgage Corporation
HANKS LAW GROUP Karen L. Hanks, Esq. Chantel M. Schimming, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff, SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[THIRD REQUEST]
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiff SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC (“SFR”) and Defendant PHH Mortgage Corporation (“PHH”), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
WHEREAS, on January 10, 2023, PHH filed its Renewed Motion to Dismiss or, Alternatively, for Summary Judgment (“Motion”). ECF No. 42.
WHEREAS, on January 24, 2023, PHH and SFR entered into a stipulation providing for an extension of time for SFR to file its response to the Motion. ECF No. 43. The Stipulation was granted by the Court. ECF No. 44.
WHEREAS, on February 17, 2023, PHH and SFR entered into a stipulation providing for a second extension of time for SFR to file its response to the Motion. ECF No. 45. SFR and PHH also stipulated to provide an extension of time for PHH to file its Reply in support of the Motion. Id. The Stipulation was granted by the Court. ECF No. 46.
WHEREAS, SFR filed its Response to the Motion on February 24, 2023. ECF No. 47. PHH's Reply in support of the Motion is currently due on 4/7/2023, pursuant to the above-referenced Stipulation and Order entered on February 21, 2023 (ECF No. 46) and a second Stipulation and Order entered on March 22, 2023. ECF No. 49.
WHEREAS, counsel for PHH has been unwell and had to take time out of the office which has continued to impact her ability to timely prepare PHH's Reply in accordance with the previously-requested extensions. In addition, the Motion and SFR's Response raise numerous complex legal issues which require additional time to analyze and address in PHH's Reply. Accordingly, PHH seeks an additional 7 calendar days to prepare and file its Reply in support of the Motion.
WEHREFORE, based on the foregoing, PHH and SFR hereby agree and stipulate that the current deadline for PHH to file its Reply in support of the Motion, April 7, 2023, should be continued by 7 calendar days to April 14, 2023.
IT IS SO ORDERED.