Opinion
2:22-cv-00507-RFB-EJY
02-21-2023
SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, Plaintiff, v. PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION; DOES I through X; ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES I through X, inclusive, Defendants.
CHRISTINA V. MILLER, ESQ. HUGO E. HERNANDEZ-DIAZ, ESQ. Attorneys for PHH Mortgage Corporation KAREN L. HANKS, ESQ. CHANTEL M. SCHIMMING, ESQ. ANA P. MURGUIA, ESQ. Attorneys for SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC
CHRISTINA V. MILLER, ESQ. HUGO E. HERNANDEZ-DIAZ, ESQ. Attorneys for PHH Mortgage Corporation
KAREN L. HANKS, ESQ. CHANTEL M. SCHIMMING, ESQ. ANA P. MURGUIA, ESQ. Attorneys for SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Second Request)
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiff, SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC and Defendant, PHH Mortgage Corporation hereby stipulate that Plaintiff shall have until February 24, 2023, to file its response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, or in the alternative, for Summary Judgment. [ECF No. 42].
The current deadline for Plaintiff's response is February 17, 2023. Plaintiff seeks the extension because undersigned counsel had a medical emergency with her child this past weekend and this week involved follow-up appointments. The parties further agree PHH Mortgage shall have until March 24, 2023 to file its reply. This extension is requested because counsel for PHH will be at a conference in early March.
Neither extension is sought to prejudice any party or delay the case.
Wright, Finlay, & Zak, LLP Hanks Law Group
ORDER
IT IS SOORDERED: