Opinion
2:22-cv-00507-RFB-EJY
01-25-2023
SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, Plaintiff, v. PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION; DOES I through X; ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES I through X, inclusive, Defendants.
KAREN L. HANKS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 9578, CHANTEL M. SCHIMMING, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 8886, ANA P. MURGUIA, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 16284 HANKS LAW GROUP Attorneys for SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC WRIGHT, FINLAY, & ZAK, LLP CHRISTINA V. MILLER, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12448 HUGO E. HERNANDEZ-DIAZ, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 15565 Attorneys for PHH Mortgage Corporation
KAREN L. HANKS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 9578, CHANTEL M. SCHIMMING, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 8886, ANA P. MURGUIA, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 16284 HANKS LAW GROUP Attorneys for SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC
WRIGHT, FINLAY, & ZAK, LLP CHRISTINA V. MILLER, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12448 HUGO E. HERNANDEZ-DIAZ, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 15565 Attorneys for PHH Mortgage Corporation
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(FIRST REQUEST)
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiff, SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC and Defendant, PHH Mortgage Corporation hereby stipulate that Plaintiff shall have until February 17, 2023, to file its response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, or in the alternative, for Summary Judgment. [ECF No. 42].
The current deadline for Plaintiffs response is January 24, 2023. Plaintiff seeks the extension because this case is somewhat novel and as such requires additional time to research the issues presented in Defendant's motion and brief a response.
The extension is not sought to prejudice any party or delay the case.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.