From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

SFR Invs. Pool 1 v. NewRez LLC

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 25, 2023
2:22-cv-00411-JAD-DJA (D. Nev. Jan. 25, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-00411-JAD-DJA

01-25-2023

SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, Plaintiff, v. NEWREZ LLC D/B/A SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING; DOES I through X; ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES I through X, inclusive, Defendants. NEWREZ LLC D/B/A SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING, Counterclaimant, v. SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, Counterdefendant

WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP Darren T. Brenner, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 8386 Yanxiong Li, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12807 Attorneys for Bank of America, N.A. HANKS LAW GROUP Karen L. Hanks, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 9578 Chantel M. Schimming, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 8886 Attorneys for SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC AKERMAN LLP ARIEL E. STERN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 8276 NATALIE L. WINSLOW, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12125 NICHOLAS E. BELAY, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 15175 Attorneys for NewRez LLC dba. Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing


WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP Darren T. Brenner, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 8386 Yanxiong Li, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12807 Attorneys for Bank of America, N.A.

HANKS LAW GROUP Karen L. Hanks, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 9578 Chantel M. Schimming, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 8886 Attorneys for SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC

AKERMAN LLP ARIEL E. STERN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 8276 NATALIE L. WINSLOW, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12125 NICHOLAS E. BELAY, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 15175 Attorneys for NewRez LLC dba. Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

COME NOW Non-party Bank of America, N.A., Plaintiff/Counterdefendant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC and Defendant/Counterclaimant Newrez LLC dba. Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, by and through their respective counsels of record, and hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. Any party or non-party may designate as “confidential” (by stamping the relevant page or as otherwise set forth herein) any document or response to discovery which that party or non-party considers in good faith to contain nonpublic personal information (“NPI”) as defined by Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 6801-6809 et seq. (“Confidential Information”). Where a document or response consists of more than one page, the first page and each page on which Confidential Information appears shall be so designated.

2. A party or non-party may designate information disclosed during a deposition or in response to written discovery as “confidential:” by so indicating in said response or on the record at the deposition and requesting the preparation of a separate transcript of such material. Additionally, a party or non-party may designate in writing, within twenty (20) days after receipt of said responses or of the deposition transcript for which the designation is proposed, that specific pages of the transcript and/or specific responses be treated as “confidential” information. Any other party may object to such proposal, in writing or on the record. Upon such objection, the parties shall follow the procedures described in paragraph 8 below. After any designation made according to the procedure set forth in this paragraph, the designated documents or information shall be treated according to the designation until the matter is resolved according to the procedures described in paragraph 8 below, and counsel for all parties shall be responsible for making all previously unmarked copies of the designated material in their possession or control with the specified designation.

3. All information produced or exchanged in the course of this case (other than information that is publicly available) shall be used by the party or parties to whom the information is produced solely for the purpose of this case.

4. Except with the prior written consent of the other parties, or upon prior order of this Court obtained with notice to opposing counsel, Confidential Information shall not be disclosed to any person other than:

(a) counsel for the respective parties in this litigation, including in-house counsel and co-counsel retained for this litigation;
(b) employees of such counsel;
(c) individual parties, class representatives, any officer or employee of a party, to the extent deemed necessary by Counsel for the prosecution of this litigation;
(d) consultants or expert witnesses retained for the prosecution or defense of this litigation, provided that each such person shall execute a copy of the Certification attached to this Order as Exhibit A (which shall be retained by counsel to the party so disclosing the Confidential Information and made available for inspection by opposing counsel during the pendency or after the termination of the action only upon good cause shown and upon order of the Court) before being shown or given any Confidential Information and provided that if the party chooses a consultant or expert employed by a corporate defendant or one of its competitors, the party shall notify the opposing party, or designating non-party, before disclosing any Confidential Information to that individual and shall give the opposing party an opportunity to move for a protective order preventing or limiting such disclosure;
(e) any authors or recipients of the Confidential Information;
(f) the Court, personnel, and court reports; and
(g) witnesses (other than persons described in paragraph 4(e).) A witness shall sign the Certification before being shown a confidential document. Confidential Information may be disclosed to a witness who will not sign the Certification only in a deposition at which the party who designated the Confidential Information is represented or has been given notice that Confidential Information shall be designated “Confidential” pursuant to paragraph 2 above. Witnesses shown Confidential Information shall not be allowed to retain copies.

5. Any persons receiving Confidential Information shall not reveal or discuss such information to or with any person who is not entitled to receive such information, except as set forth herein.

6. Unless otherwise permitted by statute, rule, or prior Court Order, papers filed with the Court under seal shall be accompanied by a contemporaneous motion for leave to file those documents under seal and shall be filed consistent with the Court's electronic filing procedures. Notwithstanding any agreement among the parties, the party seeking to file a paper under seal bears the burden of overcoming the presumption in favor of public access to papers filed in court. See Kamakana v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006).

7. A party may designate as “confidential” documents or discovery materials produced by a non-party by providing written notice to all parties of the relevant document numbers or other identification within thirty (30) days after receiving such documents or discovery materials. Any party or non-party may voluntarily disclose to others without restriction any information designated by that party or non-party as confidential, although a document may lose its confidential status if it is made public.

8. Any party objecting to a designation of Confidential Information, including objections to portions of designations of multi-page documents, shall notify the designating party and all other parties of the objection in writing up to and through trial of the matter. This notice must specifically identify each document that the objecting party in good faith believes should not be designated as Confidential Information and provide a brief statement of the grounds for such belief. In accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure governing discovery disputes, the objecting and the designating parties thereafter shall confer within ten (10) days after the date of such objection in an attempt to resolve their differences. If the parties are unable to resolve their differences, the objecting party may after the conference concludes file with the Court a motion to remove the Confidential Information.

9. Notwithstanding any challenge to the designation of material as Confidential Information, all documents shall be treated as such and shall be subject to the provisions hereof unless and until one of the following occurs:

(a) the party or non-party claims that the material is Confidential Information withdraws such designation in writing; or
(b) the Court rules the material is not confidential.

10. All provisions of this Order restricting the communication or use of Confidential Information shall continue to be binding after the conclusion of this action, unless otherwise agreed or ordered. Upon conclusion of the litigation, a party in the possession of Confidential Information, other than that which is contained in pleadings, correspondence, and deposition transcripts, shall either (a) return such documents no later than thirty (30) days after conclusion of the action to counsel for the party or non-party, or (b) destroy such documents within the same time period.

11. The terms of this Stipulation and Order do not preclude, limit, restrict or otherwise apply to the use of documents at trial.

12. Nothing herein shall be deemed to waive any applicable privilege or work product protection, or to affect the ability of a party to seek relief for an inadvertent disclosure of material protected by privilege or work product protection.

13. Any witness or other person, firm, or entity from which is discovery is sought may be informed of and may obtain the protection of this Order by written advice to the parties' respective counselor by oral advice at the time of any deposition or similar proceeding.

Exhibit A

I,_______________, have been advised by counsel of record for __________________in __________________of the protective order governing the delivery, publication, and disclosure of confidential documents and information produced in this litigation. I have read a copy of the protective order and agree to abide by its terms.

Signed_________

Printed Name______

Date__________

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

SFR Invs. Pool 1 v. NewRez LLC

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 25, 2023
2:22-cv-00411-JAD-DJA (D. Nev. Jan. 25, 2023)
Case details for

SFR Invs. Pool 1 v. NewRez LLC

Case Details

Full title:SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, Plaintiff, v. NEWREZ LLC D/B/A SHELLPOINT…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jan 25, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-00411-JAD-DJA (D. Nev. Jan. 25, 2023)