SFR Invs. Pool 1 v. NewRez LLC

Full title: SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, Plaintiff, v. NEWREZ LLC dba SHELLPOINT…

Court: United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Nov 8, 2022

2:22-cv-00195-JCM-BNW (D. Nev. Nov. 8, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-00195-JCM-BNW

11-08-2022

SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, Plaintiff, v. NEWREZ LLC dba SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING; DOES I through X, inclusive; and ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES I through X, inclusive, Defendants. NEWREZ LLC dba SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING, Counterclaimant, v. SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC; DOES I through X, inclusive; and ROE CORPORATIONS I through X, inclusive, Counter-Defendant.

AKERMAN LLP ARIEL E. STERN, ESQ. NEVADA BAR NO. 8276 NATALIE L. WINSLOW, ESQ. NEVADA BAR NO. 12125 PAIGE L. MAGASTER, ESQ. NEVADA BAR NO. 15557 ATTORNEYS FOR NEWREZ LLC DBA SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING HANKS LAW GROUP KAREN L. HANKS, ESQ. NEVADA BAR NO. 9578 CHANTEL M. SCHIMMING, ESQ. NEVADA BAR NO. 8886 ATTORNEYS FOR SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC

BRENDA WEKSLER, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

AKERMAN LLP ARIEL E. STERN, ESQ. NEVADA BAR NO. 8276 NATALIE L. WINSLOW, ESQ. NEVADA BAR NO. 12125 PAIGE L. MAGASTER, ESQ. NEVADA BAR NO. 15557 ATTORNEYS FOR NEWREZ LLC DBA SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING

HANKS LAW GROUP KAREN L. HANKS, ESQ. NEVADA BAR NO. 9578 CHANTEL M. SCHIMMING, ESQ. NEVADA BAR NO. 8886 ATTORNEYS FOR SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO SFR'S REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION, INTERROGATORIES, AND SECOND SET OF REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS

BRENDA WEKSLER, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NewRez LLC dba Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing and SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC, hereby stipulate and agree that Shellpoint shall have until November 11, 2022, to respond to the following requests and interrogatories propounded in SFR's requests for admission, interrogatories, and second set of requests for production of documents served on September 20, 2022:

• Requests for Admission Nos. 13-41

• Interrogatories Nos. 1-7, 14-23

• Requests for Production Nos. 9-13 and 15-20

Shellpoint and SFR further agree that Shellpoint shall have until fourteen (14) days after the court rules on Shellpoint's pending protective order motion, ECF No. 45, to respond to the remaining written discovery requests.

Shellpoint does not waive any objections it may have to SFR's written discovery requests by entering into this stipulation. The parties enter into this stipulation in good faith and not for purposes of delay or to prejudice any party.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED