Opinion
2:22-CV-02035-ART-BNW
01-11-2023
SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, Plaintiff, v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC D/B/A MR. COOPER; FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION; DOES I through X; and ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES I through X, inclusive Defendants.
HANKS LAW GROUP, Chantel M. Schimming, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP, Brody R. Wight, Esq. Attorney for Defendant Nationstar Mortgage LLC D/B/A Mr. Cooper and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
HANKS LAW GROUP, Chantel M. Schimming, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff
Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP, Brody R. Wight, Esq. Attorney for Defendant Nationstar Mortgage LLC D/B/A Mr. Cooper and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
ORDER APPROVING SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINES REGARDING THE MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND REQUEST TO SET A NEW HEARING DATE
Anne R. Traum, United States District Court Judge.
Plaintiff SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC (SFR) and Defendants Nationstar Mortgage LLC D/B/A Mr. Cooper (Nationstar) and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (collectively, Defendants), by their attorneys, hereby submit this Stipulation to extend the deadlines for filing the opposition to the motion for preliminary injunction and for Defendants to respond to the Complaint. Defendants stipulate that they will not take any steps toward the foreclosure of the property located at 7927 Capistrano Valley Ave., Las Vegas NV 89178 (the Property) unless and until the Court issues an order denying SFR's motion for a preliminary injunction.
Currently, Defendants' opposition to the motion is due on January 13, 2023. Defendants need extra time to review the allegations in the Complaint and the relevant documents in their possession. The parties, therefore, request that the deadlines associated with the motion for preliminary injunction be pushed out in order to give Defendants time to respond. This stipulation is made in good faith and not for any dilatory motive such as to cause undue delay. The parties further agree and stipulate that Defendants' responsive pleading to the Complaint shall be due on the same date as the opposition to the motion for preliminary injunction.
The parties' specific stipulations are as follows:
1. The deadline for Defendants to respond to the motion for preliminary injunction currently set for January 13, 2023, should be extended to January 27, 2023.
2. The deadline for Defendants to file a responsive pleading to the Complaint should be extended to January 27, 2023.
2. The deadline for SFR to file a reply currently set for January 20, 2023, shall be extended to February 3, 2023.
ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants shall file its response to Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction on or before January 27, 2023.
IT IS FURTHER HEREBY ORDERED that he deadline for Defendants to file a responsive pleading to the Complaint should be extended to January 27, 2023.
IT IS FURTHER HEREBY ORDERED that any reply in support of the motion for preliminary injunction shall be filed on or before February 3, 2023.
IT IS FURTHER HEREBY ORDERED that the temporary restraining order that this Court entered in this case shall be extended to the date of the hearing on the motion for preliminary injunction. The courtroom deputy will reach out to counsel to secure a date for the motion hearing.